Revision as of 23:21, 10 September 2019 by Tmccormick (Talk | contribs)

Revision as of 23:21, 10 September 2019 by Tmccormick (Talk | contribs)

Paquet, The New Geo-Governance, 2005

recasting complex social situations as problems with definite solutions.



Paquet: seeing puzzles to solve, vs issues to address

Political philosopher Gilles Paquet ( - 2019) coined the term 'solutionism.'

In The New Geo-Governance: A Baroque Approach (2005) he wrote:

"The 'liberal constitutional project' (as Stephen Carter labels it) is predicated on the belief that only the central government has the capacity to appreciate the nature of today's problems, and to suggest meaningful solution. 'Solutionism' or 'ultrasolutionism' is indeed the name of the game: issues are interpreted as puzzles to which there is a solution, rather than problems to which there may be a response." (Paquet 2004b).

His reference is apparently to: 
Pacquet, Gilles. Pathologies de gouvernance: essais de technologie sociale (2004), but we haven't discovered whether he uses the term itself in that book. 


Dow Chemical ad campaign, 2012

"Solutionism: the new optimism " 

Solutionism: the belief that together, science and humanity can solve anything." 

TV ad:


Evgeny Morozov, To Save Everything Click Here, 2013

Morozov: technological solutionalism

Social critic and Silicon Valley gadfly Evgeny Morozov popularized the term 'solutionism' with his 2013 book To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. 

His book uses as an epigraph a version of Paquet's 2005 usage: 

"'Solutionism' [interprets] issues as puzzles to which there is a solution, rather than problems to which there may be a response." -Gilles Paquet

The term is explained further in the book:

"All these efforts to ease the torments of existence might sound like paradise to Silicon Valley. But for the rest of us, they will be hell. They are driven by a pervasive and dangerous ideology that I call “solutionism”: an intellectual pathology that recognizes problems as problems based on just one criterion: whether they are “solvable” with a nice and clean technological solution at our disposal."

"This never-ending quest to ameliorate...recasting all complex social situations either as neat problems with definite, computable solutions or as transparent and self-evident processes that can be optimized...I call the ideology that legitimizes and sanctions such aspirations 'solutionism.' I borrow this unabashedly pejorative term from the world of architecture and urban planning, where it has come to refer to an unhealthy preoccupation with sexy, monumental, and narrow-minded problems that are extremely complex, fluid, and contentious." 

Morozov discusses various other writers whom he considers to have made related critiques: 

"In his brilliant essay “In Praise of Inconsistency,” published in Dissent in 1964, the Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski argued that, given that we are regularly confronted with equally valid choices where painful ethical reflection is in order, being inconsistent is the only way to avoid becoming a doctrinaire ideologue who sticks to an algorithm. For Kolakowski, absolute consistency is identical to fanaticism."


"Design theorist Michael Dobbins has it right: solutionism presumes rather than investigates the problems that it is trying to solve." 

"Many of the antisolutionist jibes throughout this book fit into the tripartite taxonomy of reactionary social change so skillfully outlined by the social theorist Albert his influential book The Rhetoric of Reaction.

"My critique of solutionism bears some resemlance to several critiques of the numerous eaerlier efforts to put humanity into too tight a straitjacket...I'm thinking, in particular, of Ivan Illich's protestations against the highly efficient but dehumanizing systems of professional schooling and medicine, Jane Jacobs' attacks on the arrogance of urban plans...James Scott's concern with how states have forced what he calls 'legibility' on their subjects. Some might add Friedrich Hayek's opposition to central planners, with their inherent deficiency, to this list." 



  • Kolakowski, Leszek. “In Praise of Inconsistency,” Dissent, 1964. 
  • Morozov, Evgeny. "The Perils of Perfection." The New York Times, Opinion, March 2, 2013.
  • Morozov, Evgeny. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. 2013.
  • Paquet, Gilles. The New NeoGovernance: A Baroque Approach. 2005.
  • Paquet, Gilles. Pathologies de gouvernance: essais de technologie sociale. 2004. 
  • Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. 1998.